- Extell Development Co. Plan
- UNITY Community Dev. Plan
- Community Design Principles
- Agreements
- Contact Elected Officials
- Economic Analyses & Documents
   > IRS Bond Regulations
- Environmental Documents
- Legal Documents
   > Eminent Domain Lawsuit
   > EIS Lawsuit
   > MGPP Lawsuit
   > MTA Lawsuit
- Letitia James Remixed
- Letters
- Memoranda of Understanding
- News Articles/Commentary
- Position Papers
- Times Report
- White Papers
- MTA RFP & Appraisal
tel/fax: 718.362.4784

Please note our new postal address when sending contributions to the legal fund:
121 5th Avenue, PMB #150
Brooklyn, New York 11217
About DDDB
Our coalition consists of 21 community organizations and there are 51 community organizations formally aligned in opposition to the Ratner plan.

DDDB is a volunteer-run organization. We have over 5,000 subscribers to our email newsletter, and 7,000 petition signers. Over 800 volunteers have registered with DDDB to form our various teams, task-forces and committees and we have over 150 block captains. We have a 20 person volunteer legal team of local lawyers supplementing our retained attorneys.

We are funded entirely by individual donations from the community at large and through various fundraising events we and supporters have organized.

We have the financial support of well over 3,500 individual donors.

More about DDDB...
ARCHIVES: By Date| By Category| Text Search
"Why should people get to see plans? This isn't a public project."
Bruce Ratner in Crain's Nov. 8, 2009

NY State Left Behind in "Kelo's Revenge"

On Tuesday nine of eleven states passed ballot measures restricting the use of eminent domain in the wake of the nationally despised Kelo v. City of New London Supreme Court decision of 2005. That decision opened the door for broad definitions of "public benefit" justifying the government's seizure of private property to transfer to private entities. The ballot measures which passed narrowed the meaning of "public use" as a corrective to eminent domain abuse which, over the past 50 years, has perverted the intentions of the Fifth Amendment. The two states that didn't pass their ballot measures saw eminent domain reform hijacked by different agendas that made the bills too broad for passage. All the measures that passed did so with at least 63% of the vote.

It is clear that American citizens understand eminent domain abuse better than most of the officials they elect, and want to see it returned to its proper, constititutional use. When pure eminent domain reform is proposed we consistently find ordinary citizens pitted against municipalities and real estate developers with vested interests in keeping eminent domain laws as broad as possible.

New York State and Forest City Ratner, we believe, are abusing eminent domain in an unconstitutional manner, and owners and tenants in the proposed "Atlantic Yards" footprint have filed a federal lawsuit saying so. New York State, perhaps one of the worst abusers after only New Jersey, was unable to bring numerous eminent domain reform bills out of the Assembly judiciary committee. The Senate judiciary committee did move bills forward to the Senate but they have not moved forward. Albany has not even been able to pass a bill that would simply set up a commission to further study the need for eminent domain reform. Thus New Yorkers are left with only one option to protect their rights–the courts. (By the way, oddly enough, Governor Pataki did indeed prohibit eminent domain for the NY Interconnect power line project–a traditional public use–while supporting it fully for Ratner's luxury housing and arena project–a non-traditional use. Pataki is named as a defendant in the lawsuit referred to above.)

The Castle Coalition has the full results of the various ballot meausres around the country.

CNNMoney accuratley calls it "Kelo's Revenge."

And the Atlantic Yards Report examines the measure passed in Michigan and how the Michigan measure would impact "Atlantic Yards" were such legislation passed in Albany:
After Michigan vote, AY project wouldn't fly there

What if the Atlantic Yards project were proposed for Michigan? It would be much, much tougher to approve a project that, like AY, is predicated on the elimination of blight. On Tuesday, Michigan voters by a 4-1 margin endorsed a constitutional amendment tightening the use of eminent domain. 

According to the summary by the Michigan League of Women Voters, the amendment will:
--Prohibit government from taking private property for transfer to another private individual or business for purposes of economic development or increasing tax revenue. 
--Provide that if an individual's principal residence is taken by government for public use, the individual must be paid at least 125% of property's fair market value. 
--Require government that takes a private property to demonstrate that the taking is for a public use; if taken to eliminate blight, require a higher standard of proof to demonstrate that the taking of that property is for a public use...

Continue reading....



Posted: 11.09.06
DDDB.net en español.
Battle for Brooklyn
Screening Schedule

Battle Fore Brooklyn
Unity 4 Community Meeting, June 15th at 388 Atlantic Avenue

Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn on Facebook

Click here
to order DDDB tshirts. They cost $20 and all funds go to our legal campaign, shirts come in black, red, gold and pink tanktops.

Eminent Domain Case
Goldstein et al v. ESDC
[All case files]

November 24, 2009
Court of Appeals
Ruling

[See ownership map]

EIS Lawsuit

DDDB et al v ESDC et al
Click for a summary of the lawsuit seeking to annul the review and approval the Atlantic Yards project.

Appeal briefs are here.

2/26/09
Appellate Divsion
Rules for ESDC
What would Atlantic Yards Look like?...
Photo Simulations
Before and After views from around the project footprint revealing the massive scale of the proposed luxury apartment and sports complex.

Click for
Screening Schedule
of
Isabel Hill's
"Atlantic Yards" documentary
Brooklyn Matters


Read a review
-----------------------
Atlantic Yards
would be
Instant
Gentrification
Click image to see why:


-No Land Grab.org

-Atlantic Yards Report
-Atlantic Yards Deathwatch
-The Footprint Gazette
-Brooklyn Matters
-Noticing New York
-NY Times "The Local" FG/CH
-Brooklyn Views
-Council of B'klyn N'hoods
-The Brooklyn Paper
-The Brooklyn Wire
-Atlantic Lots
-Who Walk in Brooklyn
-S. Oxford St. Block Assoc.
-City Limits City Blogs
-The Knickerblogger
-Anyplace, Brooklyn
-Bklyn Bridge Park Defense
-Bay Ridge Journal
-Clawback
-Picketing Henry Ford
-Castle Coalition Blog
-Dope on the Slope
-Gowanus Lounge
-Fans For Fair Play
-Views from the Bridge
-Old First Blog
-DailyHeights.com
-Brooklyn Footprints
-Freddys Bklyn Roundhouse
-Ctr for the Study of Bklyn
-Pardon Me for Asking
-Clinton Hill Blog
-Only The Blog Knows BK
-Brownstoner
-Sustainable Flatbush
-A Child Grows in Bklyn
-Williamsburg Warriors

-The Real Estate
-Rail Yards Blog (H. Yards)
-OnNYTurf-Atlantic Yards
-Manhattan User's Guide
-Naparstek
-Streets Blog
-Urban Place & Space
-New York Games
-Field of Schemes
-News 12 Brooklyn
-Queens Crap
-Dist.35 Comm'ity Gazette
-Save Our Parks (Bronx)
-Eminent Domain Watch
-NJ Eminent Domain Law
-PLANYC
-Big Cities Big Boxes
-www.DANDOCTOROFF.com
-Olympic Bloomdoggle
-TenantServices.com
-Tenant.net