 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
tel/fax:
718.362.4784
Please note our new postal address when sending
contributions to the legal fund:
121 5th Avenue, PMB #150
Brooklyn, New York 11217
About DDDB
Our coalition consists of 21 community organizations and
there are 51 community organizations formally
aligned in opposition to the Ratner plan.
DDDB is a volunteer-run organization. We have over 5,000
subscribers to our email newsletter, and 7,000 petition
signers. Over 800 volunteers have registered with DDDB
to form our various teams, task-forces and committees
and we have over 150 block captains. We have a 20 person
volunteer legal team of local lawyers supplementing our
retained attorneys.
We are funded entirely by individual donations from the community at large
and through various fundraising events we and supporters have organized.
We have the financial support of well over 3,500 individual
donors.
More about
DDDB...
|
|
|
|
 |
ARCHIVES:
By Date|
By Category|
Text Search
|
Times Critic Ouroussoff Takes Forest City Ratner to the Woodshed For Gehry Bait-and-Switch

The
new Barclays Centter Hangar design.
In the wake of the Great Bruce
Ratner Frank Gehry Bait 'n' Switch©, NY Times architecture critic
Nicolai Ouroussoff takes developer Forest City Ratner to the woodshed.:
Battle
Between Budget and Beauty, Which Budget Won
The recent news that the developer Forest City Ratner had scrapped Frank Gehry’s
design for a Nets arena in central Brooklyn is not just a blow to the art of
architecture. It is a shameful betrayal of the public trust, one that
should enrage all those who care about this city.
Whatever you may have felt about Mr. Gehry’s design — too big, too
flamboyant — there is little doubt that it was thoughtful architecture.
His arena complex, in which the stadium was embedded in a matrix of towers resembling
falling shards of glass, was a striking addition to the Brooklyn skyline; it
was also a fervent effort to engage the life of the city below.
A new design by the firm Ellerbe Becket has no such ambitions. A colossal, spiritless
box, it would fit more comfortably in a cornfield than at one of the busiest
intersections of a vibrant metropolis. Its low-budget, no-frills design embodies
the crass, bottom-line mentality that puts personal profit above the public
good. If it is ever built, it will create a black hole in the heart of a vital
neighborhood.
...
In a stunning bait-and-switch, Forest City Ratner (which was the development
partner for The New York Times Company’s headquarters in Midtown) has
now decided that it can’t afford an architect of Mr. Gehry’s stature.
Neglecting to tell the public, the firm went out months ago and hired Ellerbe
Becket, corporate architects known for producing generic, unimaginative buildings.
And although it has refused to release details of the design, the renderings,
obtained by The New York Times, tell you all you need to know.
...
A massive vaulted shed that rests on a masonry base, the arena is as glamorous
as a storage warehouse.
...
Building this monstrosity at such a critical urban intersection would be deadly.
Clearly, the city would be better off with nothing.
...
I suppose we should have seen this coming. The scale and location of the project
posed serious challenges — challenges that could not be solved by the
conventional development formulas. Arenas are notorious black holes in urban
neighborhoods, sitting empty most of the year and draining the life around them.
And in this case, the arena would dominate a major intersection and anchor a
dense 22-acre residential development several blocks to the east.
Notably Ouroussoff, unlike
Steve Cuozzo's knee-jerk comments in the NY Post, places the blame
squarely on Forest City Ratner's head and, to a lesser extent, government—right
where it belongs.
We suggest reading the
whole tirade (we also strongly suggest going
to the article and email it to friends--click "email" link
to right of article--to make it the day's most popular article.)
Our opposition to Atlantic Yards, to name just a few reasons, has always been
about the political corruption, the sweetheart, backroom deals, the laughable
and undemocratic approval "process," the ongoing bait-and-switch, the feeding
from the public subsidy trough, the abuse of eminent domain, the superblocks,
and the offensive scale and density of the project. We also weren't too pleased
when the now-lamented Gehry said in 2003 that he was "excited to build a neighborhood
practically from scratch."
The opposition is about the concept of the arena itself, NOT what it looks like
or who designed it. It was wrongheaded as a concept in 2003, and it is wrongheaded
as a concept now. An arena doesn't belong and doesn't fit in the fabric of Brownstone
Brooklyn, or any residential neighborhood. That is why city zoning regulations,
overridden in this instance by the state, do not allow arenas in residential neighborhoods.
Ellerbe Becket, Lemony Snicket or Frank Gehry could be the architect, but it all
would be just so much window-dressing on an affront to the community.
There is no accounting for taste. Some like Gehry some don't. Some like Ellerbe
Becket (really, some do) and some don't. Whether one prefers spaceships to airplane
hangars is not the issue.
We fully understand that Ouroussoff must view the project through his critic's
lens, and well he should (though had he brought his skeptic lens earlier, he might
not be kicking himself now, as
Norman Oder thoroughly explains.) And though we don't agree with him that
Atlantic Yards was ever about the public good—even as architecture—we do agree
with him that Ratner's dumping of Gehry is a "shameful betrayal of the public
trust," and a bait-and-switch.
The final dots that need to be connected are left unconnected by Ourossoff. Bait-and-switchers
don't just bait-and-switch once, it is a pattern. And if Ratner's Gehry bait-and-switch
is stunning, so is the bait-and-switch on "affordable" housing, "publicly accessible
open space," job creation, commercial space, reneging
on a contract with the MTA, and changing the project timeline from 10 years
to, unofficially "decades" and officially 6 years to build just the arena according
to state financing documents. Atlantic Yards itself is a monument to bait-and-switch.
And remember, numerous times over the past six months various Ratner team members,
including Bruce Ratner, Nets President Brett Yormark, and Forest City Ratner mouthpiece
Joe DePlasco have all told the public, through reporters, that Frank Gehry was
their architect for the arena when all the while Elllerbe Becket was working up
their new "spiritless
box" or "airplane
hangar."
Why should anyone trust Forest City about anything they say or do, at this point?
Now we need our elected leaders, starting with Gov Paterson, to restore
the public trust, to convince us that they view the public as more than mere play
things for duplicitous developers and backdrops for ribbon cuttings. We need the
man in charge of the two agencies preparing to make concessions to Forest City
for its Zombie Project—the MTA and the Empire State Development Corporation—to
say enough is enough, and take away Ratner's tackle box so the Atlantic Yards
bait-and-switch ploys can be put to rest.
Posted: 6.08.09
|
|
 |
 |